Three Kinds of Collective Attitudes Christian List
نویسنده
چکیده
This paper offers a comparison of three different kinds of collective attitudes: aggregate, common, and corporate attitudes. They differ not only in their relationship to individual attitudes – e.g., whether they are “reducible” to individual attitudes – but also in the roles they play in relation to the collectives to which they are ascribed. The failure to distinguish them can lead to confusion, in informal talk as well as in the social sciences. So, the paper’s message is an appeal for disambiguation.
منابع مشابه
The aggregation of propositional attitudes: towards a general theory
How can the propositional attitudes of several individuals be aggregated into overall collective propositional attitudes? Although there are large bodies of work on the aggregation of various special kinds of propositional attitudes, such as preferences, judgments, probabilities and utilities, the aggregation of propositional attitudes is seldom studied in full generality. In this paper, we see...
متن کاملانواع سازمانهای مدیریت جمعی
Authors of literary and artistic works have different exclusive rights like reproduction right, broadcasting right and distribution right. Increasing growth of new communication technologies facilitate allowed and non-allowed uses of literary and artistic works and owners of works could not control uses of their works. In this condition, collective management system and collective management or...
متن کاملThe Effect of Social Network Use on EFL Learners’ Second Language Achievement: An Investigation into their Attitudes
The efforts were made in the present study to seek two objectives: determining the effect of Telegram as a social network on second language achievement of Iranian foreign language (EFL) learners, and exploring the EFL learner’ attitude toward using Telegram for language learning purposes. To this end, 40 EFL learners were randomly selected and then divided into two groups of experimental and c...
متن کاملبررسی و مقایسۀ اشتراک دانش در میان کتابداران عضو گروههای بحث الکترونیکی علوم کتابداری و اطلاعرسانی ایران، آمریکا و استرالیا
Purpose: The current research aims to investigate the status of knowledge sharing amongst librarians in LIS, ALA and ALIA discussion groups. Methodology: Through purposive sampling, librarians from three discussion groups (ALA, ALIA & LIS-Iranian discussion list) who announced their intention to participate in the research (460 people) were asked to complete the questionnaire between 2010/10/...
متن کاملPropositionwise judgment aggregation: the general case
In the theory of judgment aggregation, it is known for which agendas of propositions it is possible to aggregate individual judgments into collective ones in accordance with the Arrow-inspired requirements of universal domain, collective rationality, unanimity preservation, non-dictatorship and propositionwise independence. But it is only partially known (e.g., only in the monotonic case) for w...
متن کامل